<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Heavy &#187; Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securityheavy.com/category/data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securityheavy.com</link>
	<description>InfoSec, Marketing, Public Relations, Social Media, Life in General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:36:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting News About Cloud Reliability</title>
		<link>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/10/interesting-news-about-cloud-reliability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/10/interesting-news-about-cloud-reliability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blogger in Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Pubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityheavy.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Joe Franscella &#8211; Read an interesting blog post by Larry Dignan at ZDNet Between the Lines blog this morning, IBM targets Google Apps for business, undercuts pricing and touts reliability. One paragraph really caught my attention: The LotusLive iNotes launch, set to be announced on Monday, pushes reliability in a big way. Taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-549" title="ZDnetlogo" src="http://www.securityheavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ZDnetlogo-300x157.jpg" alt="ZDnetlogo" width="300" height="157" />Posted by Joe Franscella &#8211;</strong></p>
<p>Read an interesting blog post by Larry Dignan at <em>ZDNet Between the Lines</em> blog this morning, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=25217&amp;tag=nl.e539">IBM targets Google Apps for business, undercuts pricing and touts reliability</a>. One paragraph really caught my attention:</p>
<p><em>The LotusLive iNotes launch, set to be announced on Monday, pushes <strong>reliability </strong>in a big way. Taking a jab at Google’s outages, IBM said it’s imperative that cloud computing “is ready for the enterprise when it’s designed for the enterprise, by the enterprise, and of the enterprise.” Word of IBM’s iNotes move </em><a href="http://www.techmeme.com/091001/p81#a091001p81"><em>began to surface</em></a><em> late Thursday and Big Blue has had a </em><a href="https://www.lotuslive.com/en/services/inotes"><em>LotusLive iNotes site</em></a><em> live for days.</em></p>
<p>It begs a couple questions: 1.) Who measures reliability? Do you leave that to that to the vendor or should you use a third-party app to provide a neutral perspective; 2.) What about seurity? How is access being managed, monitored and audited? (Note to Larry &#8211; Take a look at my email offer to provide some perspective &#8211; please, please, please!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/10/interesting-news-about-cloud-reliability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Grid &amp; Cloud Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/04/more-grid-cloud-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/04/more-grid-cloud-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blogger in Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen Messmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enetrprise_defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Grid Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Greene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityheavy.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Network World&#8217;s Ellen Messmer took the electric grid hacking investigation a few steps further with a great piece today &#8211; How serious is threat to power grid? Depends who you ask. In it, she asks a number of experts from different facets of the technology spectrum what their chief concerns are regarding the news of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/index.html">Network World&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/Home/emessmer.html">Ellen Messmer</a> took the electric grid hacking investigation a few steps further with a great piece today &#8211; <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/040909-power-grid-threat.html?hpg1=bn">How serious is threat to power grid? Depends who you ask</a>. In it, she asks a number of experts from different facets of the technology spectrum what their chief concerns are regarding the news of the hack. She got some interesting respoonses:</p>
<p><em>“There is hacking,” says Legge. “Hackers are coming after the electrical grid all the time.” (Ed Legge is pokesman for the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), an association representing    about 70 of the largest utilities which generate the bulk of the nation’s electricity through complex swatches of eastern-    and western-distribution grids and management and control points called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_System_Operator">Independent System Operators</a>)</em></p>
<p>What the security vendors said:</p>
<p><em>“The whole grid going down is the hardest one to believe,” says Eric Knight, senior knowledge engineer at Log Rhythm, noting    the Wall Street Journal article lacked sufficient information “about why we should be panicking, per se.”</em></p>
<p><em>“This should come as a surprise to no one,” says Patrick Peterson, chief security researcher at Cisco, adding, “The truth    is slowly coming out.”</em></p>
<p><em>Shane Buckley, CEO at <a href="http://www.rohati.com">Rohati</a>, says he&#8217;s worries that “a number of utilities outsource development to Eastern Europe, Russia    and China,” and cyberspy attacks could originate through outsourcing. (Disclaimer: I represent Rohati).</em></p>
<p>These stories hit hard and fast but I doubt they are over. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com">Network World&#8217;s</a> Tim Greene launched his <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/vpn/2009/040609cloudsec2.html">Cloud Security Alert</a> newsletter today with a look at <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/vpn/2009/040609cloudsec2.html">What is a cloud?</a> Wrote Tim:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;So the cloud is a physical place, perhaps owned and controlled by some other entity, and it contains computing resources that    are available pretty much on demand for a price. Simple enough, but there are plenty of variations.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>He goes on to explain it further, leaving the reader with a basic deffinition, something of value in today&#8217;s (excuse me for this nest description) &#8220;foggy cloud environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>In terms of cloud deffinitions, I also like the one in Gartner&#8217;s 2008 paper: Tutorial for Understanding the Relationship Between Cloud Computing and SaaS</p>
<p>In the paper, Gartner defines cloud computing as: <em>a style of computing where massively scalable ITenabled capabilities are delivered as a service to external customers using Internet technologies. One IT-related function can be a software application. If the software application is written in such a way that it is &#8220;massively scalable,&#8221; then SaaS is considered a form of cloud computing (SaaS).</em></p>
<p>Posted by Joe Franscella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityheavy.com/2009/04/more-grid-cloud-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

